Product Development
Machine Learning

TRADR DSP | ML Powered Predictive Clearing

My Role
Senior Product Manager
Timeline
Jun - Oct 2022

The Problem

Traditionally, second-price auctions in programmatic environments allowed advertisers to safely bid their true value without overpaying; with the final price settling just above the second-highest bid. However, as the industry shifted toward first-price auctions in the late 2010s, where the highest bidder pays exactly what was bid, a new challenge emerged—bid inefficiency and unnecessary cost inflation.

Without the safety net of a second-price mechanism, DSPs and advertisers had to make a choice: bid aggressively and risk overpaying, or bid conservatively and risk losing valuable inventory. To remain competitive, many advertisers erred on the side of overbidding, leading to significant bid waste and rising acquisition costs.

TRADR DSP saw an opportunity to solve this problem through predictive clearing—a machine learning-powered approach to estimating the true clearing price of an auction in real time. By accurately forecasting the minimum winning bid, the DSP could dynamically adjust bids, reducing unnecessary spending while maintaining competitive auction participation.

The result? Lower costs for advertisers, increased efficiency for TRADR, and a smarter way to navigate first-price auctions.

The Role

As the Senior Product Manager for this initiative, I led the development and implementation of the Predictive Clearing Model within TRADR DSP. My role spanned multiple facets of the product lifecycle—from defining the vision and scope to working closely with engineering and data science teams to refine the model and bring it to market.

Key Responsibilities:

  • Defining the Problem & Opportunity:
    I worked closely with our data science team to analyze auction dynamics, identify inefficiencies in bidding behavior, and validate the impact of bid waste on advertiser costs. This research helped shape the problem statement and guide our approach.
  • Developing Scope & Strategy:
    Collaborating with engineering, I outlined the core requirements for the model, ensuring it could seamlessly integrate into our DSP’s bidding engine. The model prioritized real-time inference, model explainability, and cost-efficiency.
  • Refining the Model with Engineering & Data Science:
    Throughout development, I worked closely with our machine learning engineers and backend developers, refining how bid predictions were generated, tested, and deployed. I also helped drive the balance between predictive accuracy vs. performance trade-offs, ensuring the model could operate within the DSP’s millisecond-level bidding constraints.
  • Driving Execution & Go-to-Market:
    I coordinated cross-functional teams, managed stakeholder expectations, and ensured alignment across product, engineering, and business teams. As we moved toward launch, I worked with AdOps and Sales teams to develop an adoption strategy, ensuring advertisers understood the benefits of the new system.
  • Measuring Impact & Iteration:
    Post-launch, I helped define success metrics, track adoption, and work with data teams to analyze real-world performance. Using feedback loops, we identified areas for refinement and planned iterations to further optimize the model’s efficiency.

By taking a data-driven and collaborative approach, our team ensured the Predictive Clearing Model not only improved bidding efficiency but also provided tangible cost savings for advertisers.

The Outcome

The Predictive Clearing Model transformed how TRADR DSP approached bidding in first-price auctions, delivering significant efficiency gains and cost savings for advertisers. By leveraging machine learning to estimate the optimal bid price in real-time, we were able to reduce bid waste while maintaining strong win rates.

Key Results:

  • 17% Reduction in CPMs: Advertisers paid closer to the actual clearing price, minimizing excessive spend.
  • <2% Decrease in Win Rates: The model allowed bid prices to come down without sacrificing competitiveness.
  • Seamless Integration into TRADR DSP: The model operated within strict real-time constraints, ensuring minimal impact on bid latency.

Beyond the numbers, the project had a meaningful impact on advertiser trust and DSP differentiation. Advertisers could now bid confidently, knowing their spend was being optimized, and TRADR DSP strengthened its position as a more intelligent, cost-efficient platform in a competitive market.

The Lessons Learned

Building and deploying the Predictive Clearing Model provided valuable insights into the complexities of machine learning-driven bidding optimization in a high-speed programmatic environment. Here are some of the key takeaways from the project:

  1. Model Accuracy vs. Performance Trade-offs
    One of the biggest challenges was balancing predictive accuracy with real-time performance constraints. While more complex models provided better bid price estimates, they often required additional compute time, which wasn’t feasible in a millisecond-level bidding environment. We had to optimize for a model that was both accurate and lightweight, ensuring minimal impact on bid latency.
  2. The Importance of Real-Time Data Signals
    Initially, we relied on historical auction data to train the model. However, we found that incorporating real-time auction signals—such as time-of-day trends, competition levels, and device types—significantly improved bid accuracy. As we iterate, incorporating these dynamic signals without dramatically increasing compute time will be a key improvement.
  3. Advertiser Trust & Transparency Matter
    While the model delivered tangible cost savings, some advertisers were initially skeptical about how bids were being adjusted. Providing more transparency—such as insights into why a bid was lowered and how it compared to previous auction trends—improving education and materials around this decision making could further drive adoption and trust.
  4. Incremental Rollout & A/B Testing Are Critical
    Rolling out an ML-driven pricing model across all inventory at once carried risks, but due to economic pressures the rollout was "fast-tracked.". Looking back I would have highly recommended a phased roll-out of the model as well as A/B testing to validate its effectiveness before full deployment. This would have helped significantly in refining key parameters and minimizing unintended impacts on campaign performance.
  5. Continuous Model Optimization is Essential
    Bid landscapes change rapidly, and what worked at launch might not be so in six months. As we iterate it is vital to build a framework for ongoing model retraining, ensuring that it evolves with market trends, competitive dynamics, and new data inputs. ML models in programmatic advertising require constant monitoring and tuning to stay effective.